Kylie Padilla, ipinagdiinang hindi si AJ Raval ang third party sa hiwalayan nila ni Aljur Abrenica

Kylie Padilla recently reacted to her separated spouse Aljur Abrenica’s growing affair with young beautiful actress AJ Raval.

Kylie made the comment during a chat with her followers on the “Kylievers” group chat.

The user name “kylienicolepadilla” revealed the following: “And yes, i just want to confirm hindi nga si aj ang third party.”

Which her admirers enthusiastically embraced, adding: “We respect your privacy po.”

The actress continued: “Gusto ko na mag move on. Hehehe.”

“Pero thank you sa love and support… Naappreciate ko kayong lahat sobr (heart emoji).”

It’s worth noting that Kylie already issued a statement on Aljur’s return to the dating scene.

Kylie wrote on Twitter: “Guys, there is no issue. We separated April pa, and we have already mutually agreed to date other people. Please stop dragging other parties into this. I have no intention of disclosing any more of what happened because I want to cherish the littlest ounce of privacy I have left.”

Robin Padilla’s daughter thanked everyone for their “compassion.”

Her children with Aljur are “happy” and “stable,” according to her, and this is their “primary focus.”

The 31-year-old handsome actor has recently made news after revealing he was dating a 21-year-old beautiful actress.

In fact, AJ proudly revealed that Aljur is attempting to “old school” her lovely “yes.”

Meanwhile, images of AJ and Aljur going through a mall holding hands became viral lately.

And netizens immediately discovered that Kylie had “liked” the stated photo, which had been re-posted by an online news site.

It was early this year that rumors of Kylie and Aljur’s marital problems became public.

What can you say about this story? Share us your thoughts in the comment section and let us have some discussions!

The post Kylie Padilla, ipinagdiinang hindi si AJ Raval ang third party sa hiwalayan nila ni Aljur Abrenica appeared first on Sasafeed.


Source: Sasa Feed

Post a Comment

0 Comments